Re: tuning questions
Matt Clark <matt@ymogen.net>
From: "Matt Clark" <matt@ymogen.net>
To: "Jack Coates" <jack@lyris.com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-12-09T17:07:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
> I ended up going back to a default postgresql.conf and reapplying the > various tunings one-by-one. Turns out that while setting fsync = false > had little effect on the slow IDE box, it had a drastic effect on this > faster SCSI box and performance is quite acceptable now (aside from the > expected falloff of about 30% after the first twenty minutes, which I > believe comes from growing and shrinking tables without vacuumdb > --analyzing). Hmm. I wonder if that could be related to the issue where many IDE drives have write-caching enabled. With the write cache enabled fsyncs are nearly immediate, so setting fsync=false makes little difference...