Re: tuning questions

Matt Clark <matt@ymogen.net>

From: "Matt Clark" <matt@ymogen.net>
To: "Jack Coates" <jack@lyris.com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-12-09T17:07:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
> I ended up going back to a default postgresql.conf and reapplying the
> various tunings one-by-one. Turns out that while setting fsync = false
> had little effect on the slow IDE box, it had a drastic effect on this
> faster SCSI box and performance is quite acceptable now (aside from the
> expected falloff of about 30% after the first twenty minutes, which I
> believe comes from growing and shrinking tables without vacuumdb
> --analyzing).

Hmm.  I wonder if that could be related to the issue where many IDE drives have write-caching enabled.  With the write cache enabled
fsyncs are nearly immediate, so setting fsync=false makes little difference...