Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>

From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>

Date: 2010-07-02T16:36:10Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it.  So, +1 to
>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
>> an operator until later.
> 
> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
> "slice()" is OK by me.

Will this be done for Beta 3?

Best,

David