Re: Autoanalyze and OldestXmin
Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-09T15:05:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 09-Jun-2011, at 8:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Pavan Deolasee >> <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I am wondering if we shouldn't be asking ourselves a different >>>> question: why is ANALYZE running long enough on your tables for this >>>> to become an issue? How long is it taking? > >>> The log file attached in the first post has the details; it's taking around 5 mins for the accounts table with 50 scale factor and 50 clients > >> Wow, that's slow. Still, what if the user were doing a transaction of >> comparable size? It's not like ANALYZE is doing a gigantic amount of >> work. > > I wonder what vacuum cost delay settings are in use ... > Default settings with 512Mb shared buffers Thanks. Pavan