Thread
Commits
-
Fix HBA option count
- dc24c9ad527f 17.3 landed
- 9e596a099ad4 14.16 landed
- 9ad7a32b2a15 15.11 landed
- 97698cc517c7 18.0 landed
- 7b1f50d8c87d 13.19 landed
- 116036d811cc 16.7 landed
-
Fix missing ldapscheme option in pg_hba_file_rules()
- c35bbdfbc0d3 16.7 landed
- 8ed9bf0a3217 17.3 landed
- 84b8f6d9f59a 13.19 landed
- 83ffb9f20f06 14.16 landed
- 830215a4c887 15.11 landed
- 27a1f8d10811 18.0 landed
-
BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
The Post Office <noreply@postgresql.org> — 2025-01-09T09:45:43Z
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 18769 Logged by: Laurenz Albe Email address: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at PostgreSQL version: 17.2 Operating system: any Description: For whatever reason, the "ldapscheme" option was forgotten in the function pg_hba_file_rules().
-
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> — 2025-01-09T09:54:15Z
On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 09:45 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > For whatever reason, the "ldapscheme" option was forgotten in the function > pg_hba_file_rules(). Here is a patch to fix the omission. Yours, Laurenz Albe
-
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> — 2025-01-09T10:00:48Z
On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 10:54 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 09:45 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > For whatever reason, the "ldapscheme" option was forgotten in the function > > pg_hba_file_rules(). > > Here is a patch to fix the omission. v2 of the patch has a correct "discussion" URL in the commit message; otherwise it is unchanged. Yours, Laurenz Albe
-
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2025-01-09T12:09:32Z
> On 9 Jan 2025, at 11:00, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 10:54 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: >> On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 09:45 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: >>> For whatever reason, the "ldapscheme" option was forgotten in the function >>> pg_hba_file_rules(). >> >> Here is a patch to fix the omission. > > v2 of the patch has a correct "discussion" URL in the commit message; > otherwise it is unchanged. LGTM. -- Daniel Gustafsson
-
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> — 2025-01-10T08:00:55Z
On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 13:09 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 10:54 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 09:45 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > > > For whatever reason, the "ldapscheme" option was forgotten in the function > > > > pg_hba_file_rules(). > > > > > > Here is a patch to fix the omission. > > LGTM. Do you want to commit it, or should I add it to the next commitfest? Yours, Laurenz Albe
-
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2025-01-10T08:02:17Z
> On 10 Jan 2025, at 09:00, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 13:09 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 10:54 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 09:45 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: >>>>> For whatever reason, the "ldapscheme" option was forgotten in the function >>>>> pg_hba_file_rules(). >>>> >>>> Here is a patch to fix the omission. >> >> LGTM. > > Do you want to commit it, or should I add it to the next commitfest? I'm planning to do it today, so no need to add it. Thanks! -- Daniel Gustafsson
-
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-01-12T15:55:56Z
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: > I'm planning to do it today, so no need to add it. Thanks! Our weekly Coverity run complained about this in all branches: *** CID 181934: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) /srv/coverity/git/pgsql-git/13stable/src/backend/libpq/hba.c: 2368 in gethba_options() 2362 if (hba->ldapsearchfilter) 2363 options[noptions++] = 2364 CStringGetTextDatum(psprintf("ldapsearchfilter=%s", 2365 hba->ldapsearchfilter)); 2366 2367 if (hba->ldapscope) >>> CID 181934: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>> Overrunning array "options" of 14 8-byte elements at element index 14 (byte offset 119) using index "noptions++" (which evaluates to 14). 2368 options[noptions++] = 2369 CStringGetTextDatum(psprintf("ldapscope=%d", hba->ldapscope)); 2370 } 2371 2372 if (hba->auth_method == uaRADIUS) 2373 { Looks like you should have increased MAX_HBA_OPTIONS. The comment just above that macro needs work too. regards, tom lane -
Re: BUG #18769: ldapscheme is not displayed in pg_hba_file_rules
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2025-01-12T16:20:23Z
> On 12 Jan 2025, at 16:55, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >> I'm planning to do it today, so no need to add it. Thanks! > > Our weekly Coverity run complained about this in all branches: > > *** CID 181934: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) > /srv/coverity/git/pgsql-git/13stable/src/backend/libpq/hba.c: 2368 in gethba_options() > 2362 if (hba->ldapsearchfilter) > 2363 options[noptions++] = > 2364 CStringGetTextDatum(psprintf("ldapsearchfilter=%s", > 2365 hba->ldapsearchfilter)); > 2366 > 2367 if (hba->ldapscope) >>>> CID 181934: Memory - corruptions (OVERRUN) >>>> Overrunning array "options" of 14 8-byte elements at element index 14 (byte offset 119) using index "noptions++" (which evaluates to 14). > 2368 options[noptions++] = > 2369 CStringGetTextDatum(psprintf("ldapscope=%d", hba->ldapscope)); > 2370 } > 2371 > 2372 if (hba->auth_method == uaRADIUS) > 2373 { > > Looks like you should have increased MAX_HBA_OPTIONS. The comment > just above that macro needs work too. Ugh, I missed that when reading over the function. Thanks for the report, I'll get it fixed tonight. -- Daniel Gustafsson