Re: snapbuild woes
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,David Steele
<david@pgmasters.net>,Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>,Robert Haas
<robertmhaas@gmail.com>,Craig Ringer
<craig@2ndquadrant.com>,pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-05-08T07:10:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 3, 2017 10:45:16 PM PDT, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:42:58PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >> >> >> On April 27, 2017 9:34:44 PM PDT, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> >wrote: >> >On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:36:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >> >> On 2017-04-17 21:16:57 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >> >> > I've since the previous update reviewed Petr's patch, which he >> >since has >> >> > updated over the weekend. I'll do another round tomorrow, and >will >> >see >> >> > how it looks. I think we might need some more tests for this to >be >> >> > committable, so it might not become committable tomorrow. I >hope >> >we'll >> >> > have something in tree by end of this week, if not I'll send an >> >update. >> >> >> >> I was less productive this week than I'd hoped, and creating a >> >testsuite >> >> was more work than I'd anticipated, so I'm slightly lagging >behind. >> >I >> >> hope to have a patchset tomorrow, aiming to commit something >> >> Monday/Tuesday. >> > >> >This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. >> >Kindly send >> >a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your >subsequent >> >status >> >update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: >> >>https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com >> >> I committed part of the series today, plan to continue doing so over >the next few days. Changes require careful review & testing, this is >easy to get wrong... > >This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. >Kindly send >a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent >status >update. > >Also, this open item has been alive for three weeks, well above >guideline. I >understand it's a tricky bug, but I'm worried this isn't on track to >end. >What is missing to make it end? > >Refer to the policy on open item ownership: >https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com I plan to commit the next pending patch after the back branch releases are cut - it's an invasive fix and the issue doesn't cause corruption "just" slow slot creation. So it seems better to wait for a few days, rather than hurry it into the release. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Commits
-
Fix thinko introduced in 2bef06d516460 et al.
- d68742562ca4 9.4.13 landed
- 869a5869e5ba 9.5.8 landed
- 32d7480e02ee 9.6.4 landed
- 5af4456a5647 10.0 landed
-
Avoid superfluous work for commits during logical slot creation.
- fa9207c7415c 9.5.8 landed
- bd619fcfe046 9.6.4 landed
- 524dbc14335c 10.0 landed
- 2dca50b764d4 9.4.13 landed
-
Fix race condition leading to hanging logical slot creation.
- b64a68e3680a 9.5.8 landed
- 955a684e0401 10.0 landed
- 79abd23db1e9 9.4.13 landed
- 75784859cda2 9.6.4 landed
-
Don't use on-disk snapshots for exported logical decoding snapshot.
- b6ecf26ccc2b 9.4.12 landed
- 54270d7ebcdc 9.5.7 landed
- 29e8c881dd07 9.6.3 landed
- 56e19d938dd1 10.0 landed
-
Preserve required !catalog tuples while computing initial decoding snapshot.
- 5da64613875d 9.4.12 landed
- 47f896b5c2ec 9.5.7 landed
- 2bef06d51646 10.0 landed
- 28afff347a5d 9.6.3 landed