Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
> On Jan 15, 2026, at 00:30, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2026-01-14 11:41:19 +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>> Basically, code changes in 0003 is straightforward, just a couple of small comments:
>>
>> 1
>> ```
>> - * refcounts in buf_internals.h. This limitation could be lifted by using a
>> - * 64bit state; but it's unlikely to be worthwhile as 2^18-1 backends exceed
>> - * currently realistic configurations. Even if that limitation were removed,
>> - * we still could not a) exceed 2^23-1 because inval.c stores the ProcNumber
>> - * as a 3-byte signed integer, b) INT_MAX/4 because some places compute
>> - * 4*MaxBackends without any overflow check. We check that the configured
>> - * number of backends does not exceed MAX_BACKENDS in InitializeMaxBackends().
>> + * refcounts in buf_internals.h. This limitation could be lifted, but it's
>> ```
>>
>> Before this patch, there was room for lifting the limitation. With this
>> patch, state is 64bit already, but the significant 32bit will be used for
>> buffer locking as stated in buf_internals.h, in other words, there is no
>> room for lifting the limitation now. If that’s true, then I think we can
>> remove the statements about lifting limitation.
>
> I'm not following - there's plenty space for more bits if we need that:
>
> * State of the buffer itself (in order):
> * - 18 bits refcount
> * - 4 bits usage count
> * - 12 bits of flags
> * - 18 bits share-lock count
> * - 1 bit share-exclusive locked
> * - 1 bit exclusive locked
>
> That's 54 bits in total. Which part is in the lower and which in the upper
> 32bit isn't relevant for anything afaict?
Because I saw the comment in buf_internals.h:
```
* NB: A future commit will use a significant portion of the remaining bits to
* implement buffer locking as part of the state variable.
```
That seems to indicate all the significant 32 bits will be used for buffer locking. Also, there is an assert that concretes the impression:
```
StaticAssertDecl(BUF_REFCOUNT_BITS + BUF_USAGECOUNT_BITS + BUF_FLAG_BITS == 32,
"parts of buffer state space need to equal 32");
```
So, I thought we can explain 18bit refcount is good enough without mentioning “lifting” that potentially adds confusion to readers. But anyway, this is not a strong opinion. I won’t insist on this comment.
>
>
>> 2. By searching for “LockBufHdr”, I found one place missed to update in contrib/pg_prewarm/autoprewarm.c at line 706:
>> ```
>> for (num_blocks = 0, i = 0; i < NBuffers; i++)
>> {
>> uint32 buf_state; <=== line 706, should change to uint64
>>
>> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
>>
>> bufHdr = GetBufferDescriptor(i);
>>
>> /* Lock each buffer header before inspecting. */
>> buf_state = LockBufHdr(bufHdr);
>> ```
>
> Good catch! I didn't find any other similar omissions...
I saw you have added this occurrence to v11.
>
>
>> I will continue reviewing 0004 tomorrow.
>
> Cool.
>
> I'd like to push
>
> bufmgr: Change BufferDesc.state to be a 64-bit atomic
> bufmgr: Implement buffer content locks independently of lwlocks
>
> pretty soon, so that we then can concentrate on
Other than the “lifting” comment, v11 LGTM. But that’s not a strong opinion. I explained more above, if you consider that’s not a problem, I am totally fine.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
bufmgr: Fix ordering of checks in PinBuffer()
- c0af4eb4e71e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use UnlockReleaseBuffer() in more places
- 8df3c48e466c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Make UnlockReleaseBuffer() more efficient
- f39cb8c01106 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Don't copy pages while writing out
- 41d3d64e87af 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix use of wrong variable in _hash_kill_items()
- f5eb854ab6d6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix bug due to confusion about what IsMVCCSnapshot means
- ce5d489166e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Switch to standard order in MarkBufferDirtyHint()
- a766125efd60 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Remove the, now obsolete, BM_JUST_DIRTIED
- b0f4ff3c9266 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Require share-exclusive lock to set hint bits and to flush
- 82467f627bd4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
heapam: Don't mimic MarkBufferDirtyHint() in inplace updates
- f4a4ce52c0d1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Allow conditionally locking of already locked buffer
- 333f586372aa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Avoid spurious compiler warning after fcb9c977aa5
- 84705b37273d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
lwlock: Remove ForEachLWLockHeldByMe
- 55fbfb738b00 19 (unreleased) landed
-
lwlock: Remove support for disowned lwlwocks
- d40fd85187d0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Implement buffer content locks independently of lwlocks
- fcb9c977aa5f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Change BufferDesc.state to be a 64-bit atomic
- dac328c8a682 19 (unreleased) landed
-
lwlock: Improve local variable name
- 556c92a68972 19 (unreleased) landed
-
lwlock: Invert meaning of LW_FLAG_RELEASE_OK
- 9a385f61666c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Make definitions related to buffer descriptor easier to modify
- ff219c198789 19 (unreleased) landed
-
heapam: Add batch mode mvcc check and use it in page mode
- 0b96e734c590 19 (unreleased) landed
-
freespace: Don't modify page without any lock
- 45f658dacb9c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
heapam: Move logic to handle HEAP_MOVED into a helper function
- 548de59d93d5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Optimize & harmonize LockBufHdr(), LWLockWaitListLock()
- 09ae2c8bac8d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Add one-entry cache for private refcount
- 30df61990c67 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Separate keys for private refcount infrastructure
- edbaaea0a95e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64
- 7902a47c20b1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Rename BUFFERPIN wait event class to BUFFER
- 6c5c393b7403 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Turn BUFFER_LOCK_* into an enum
- 156680055dc5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
lwlock: Fix, currently harmless, bug in LWLockWakeup()
- 81f773895321 19 (unreleased) landed
- da3971496531 15.16 landed
- 89c8a1b9069f 16.12 landed
- 427e886a79a5 17.8 landed
- 332693e75969 14.21 landed
- 8082b759d9b5 18.2 landed
-
bufmgr: Use atomic sub for unpinning buffers
- 5310fac6e0fc 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Allow some buffer state modifications while holding header lock
- c75ebc657ffc 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Fix valgrind checking for buffers pinned in StrategyGetBuffer()
- c819d1017ddb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Don't lock buffer header in StrategyGetBuffer()
- 5e8998592879 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: fewer calls to BufferDescriptorGetContentLock
- 3baae90013df 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Fix signedness of mask variable in BufferSync()
- 2a2e1b470b9b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
bufmgr: Introduce FlushUnlockedBuffer
- 3c2b97b29ee3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve ReadRecentBuffer() scalability
- 819dc118c0f6 19 (unreleased) landed