Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck

David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>

From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-06-12T07:19:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jun 10, 2026, at 22:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> or, actually, the bug's not so old: apparently I broke it in
> e78d1d6d4.  Where's my brown paper bag?

Oh man, now I want to know what this references!

D

Commits

  1. Undo thinko in commit e78d1d6d4.

  2. Avoid leakage of zero-length arrays in partition_bounds_copy().

  3. Fix MemoryContextAllocAligned's interaction with Valgrind.

  4. Fix assorted pretty-trivial memory leaks in the backend.

  5. Improve our support for Valgrind's leak tracking.

  6. Reduce leakage during PL/pgSQL function compilation.

  7. Silence Valgrind leakage complaints in more-or-less-hackish ways.

  8. Silence complaints about leaks in PlanCacheComputeResultDesc.

  9. Suppress complaints about leaks in TS dictionary loading.

  10. Suppress complaints about leaks in function cache loading.

  11. Fix per-relation memory leakage in autovacuum.

  12. Fix AlignedAllocRealloc to cope sanely with OOM.