Horton

Re: timeout implementation issues

Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>

View thread
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, "Jessica Perry Hekman" <jphekman@dynamicdiagrams.com>, "Barry Lind" <barry@xythos.com>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-06T09:14:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane
> 
> Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes:
> >     Could  we  get  out  of  this  by  defining that "timeout" is
> >     automatically reset at next statement end?
> 
> I was hoping to avoid that, because it seems like a wart.  OTOH,
> it'd be less of a wart than the global changes of semantics that
> Bruce is proposing :-(

Probably I'm misunderstanding this thread.
Why must the query_timeout be reset particularly ?
What's wrong with simply issueing set query_timeout
command just before every query ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue