Re: timeout implementation issues
Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Jessica Perry Hekman" <jphekman@dynamicdiagrams.com>, "Barry Lind" <barry@xythos.com>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-08T21:14:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > > > > OK using your example, one by one > > > > BEGIN WORK; > > SET query_timeout=20; > > query fails; > > SET query_timeout=0; > > > > For what the SET was issued ? > > What command is issued if the query was successful ? > > > > COMMIT WORK; > > Here, SET should only to the query labeled "query fails". Why should the SET query_timeout = 0 command be issued only when the query failed ? Is it a JDBC driver's requirement or some applications' requirements which uses the JDBC driver ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue