Horton

RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?

Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>

View thread
From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>, <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2001-06-23T21:11:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> 
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Isn't it a better idea to have a separate 'SELF EXCLUSIVE' lock
> > which conflicts with only itself ?
> 
> *Only* itself?  What would that be useful for?

Isn't VacuumLock = RowExclusiveLock  + SelfExclusiveLock 
for the table ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue