Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Richard Tucker <richt@multera.com>
From: Richard Tucker <richt@multera.com>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "J. R. Nield" <jrnield@usol.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-07T15:32:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mikheev, Vadim [mailto:vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM] > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 6:01 PM > To: 'Tom Lane'; J. R. Nield > Cc: Richard Tucker; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL Hacker > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR, checkpoint, and local relations > > > > > How do you get atomic block copies otherwise? > > > > Eh? The kernel does that for you, as long as you're reading the > > same-size blocks that the backends are writing, no? > > Good point. > We know for sure the kernel does this? I think this is a dubious assumption. > Vadim >