Horton

RE: Timeout parameters

Nagaura, Ryohei <nagaura.ryohei@jp.fujitsu.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura.ryohei@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura.ryohei@jp.fujitsu.com>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "coelho@cri.ensmp.fr" <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>, "robertmhaas@gmail.com" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu" <MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu>, "AYahorau@ibagroup.eu" <AYahorau@ibagroup.eu>, "michael@paquier.xyz" <michael@paquier.xyz>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-03-28T10:11:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Hi, all.

# This is a supplement of my current patches.

> From: Nagaura, Ryohei [mailto:nagaura.ryohei@jp.fujitsu.com]
> > In TCP_backend patch:
> > I think this is not mentioning backend. Why don't you copy'n paste
> > then modify the description of tcp_keepalives_idle? Perhaps it needs
> a
> > similar caveat related to Windows.
I modified documentation with referring ones of tcp_keepalives_*.

Also, Note that:
1) I added <note> about windows OS and some linux kernels.
2) Documentations about TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is made citing description of [1].
	# The client-side patch does as well.
3) Same as keepalives*, I used both "0" and zero.
I can't recognize why to use both of them.
Is there anyone who know it?

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5482
Best regards,
---------------------
Ryohei Nagaura

Commits

  1. Add support TCP user timeout in libpq and the backend server