Re: Replace l337sp34k in comments.
x4mmm@yandex-team.ru
From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-07-31T08:21:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 28 июля 2021 г., в 04:39, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> написал(а): > > IMO the PG code comments are not an appropriate place for leetspeak creativity. > > PSA a patch to replace a few examples that I recently noticed. > > "up2date" --> "up-to-date" FWIW, my 2 cents. I do not see much difference between up2date, up-to-date, up to date, current, recent, actual, last, newest, correct, fresh etc. I'm slightly leaning to 1337 version, but this can totally be ignored. As a non-native speaker I'm a bit concerned by the fact that comment is copied 6 times. For me it's not a single bit easier to read comment then code. If this comment is that important, maybe refactor this assignment into function and document once? Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Commits
-
Clarify some comments making use of leetspeak term "up2date"
- 7b7fbe1e8bb4 15.0 landed
-
doc: restore intentional typo
- 8a47b775a16f 13.0 cited
-
Introduce logical decoding.
- b89e151054a0 9.4.0 cited