Re: operator exclusion constraints

David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>

From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-07T19:28:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Nov 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or
>> without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it  
>> seems
>> to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would
>> actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people
>> agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE.
>
> EXCLUDE sounds good to me.

+1

David