Re: operator exclusion constraints
David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-07T19:28:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Nov 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or >> without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it >> seems >> to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would >> actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people >> agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE. > > EXCLUDE sounds good to me. +1 David