Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Date: 2021-08-15T11:09:37Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Attachments
- v12-0006-Do-CIC-test-time-based-to-ensure-bug-repro.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12-0006
- v12-0005-PoC-fix-clear-xid.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12-0005
- v12-0004-Fix-CREATE-INDEX-CONCURRENTLY-in-precence-of-vxi.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12-0004
- v12-0003-Introduce-TAP-test-for-2PC-with-CIC-behavior.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12-0003
- v12-0002-PoC-fix-for-race-in-RelationBuildDesc-and-relcac.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12-0002
- v12-0001-Introduce-TAP-test-for-CIC.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v12-0001
> 15 авг. 2021 г., в 13:45, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> написал(а): >> >> Do you see failures with that loop? If so, can you diagnose them? > > See below. I do not observe failure on my laptop, though reproduced it on a linux server. I've fixed one bug in TwoPhaseGetXidByVXid(). Also rebased on actual master. > >> (So far, I've not seen a failure from the 1PC test.) > > I eventually did see one. Just one 1PC failure in six hours of 1PC test > runtime, though. I've attached a patch that reproduces the problem in 30sec on my server. Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve contrib/amcheck's tests for CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- b1f943d2aa7e 14.1 landed
- 7f580aa5d88a 15.0 landed
- 5a4b8a8a720c 13.5 landed
- 141cd0ef0b0b 12.9 landed
-
Fix minor memory leaks in pg_dump.
- 70bef494000e 15.0 cited
-
Avoid race in RelationBuildDesc() affecting CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- e428699cb3be 9.6.24 landed
- db86746fd11e 10.19 landed
- 5141e471b36a 11.14 landed
- dde966efb286 14.1 landed
- 2e33b43599ad 13.5 landed
- 0869e53d3a07 12.9 landed
- fdd965d074d4 15.0 landed
-
Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for the newest prepared transactions.
- df6158139f64 11.14 landed
- 560124a37c2f 10.19 landed
- 5184932432b4 9.6.24 landed
- fe5d44a1d38f 12.9 landed
- a9d0a5409415 13.5 landed
- a5b9a0000e14 14.1 landed
- 3cd9c3b92197 15.0 landed
-
Add -w back to the flags for pg_ctl (re)start in PostgresNode
- b33259e261ae 15.0 cited
-
Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for simultaneous prepared transactions.
- 77a0e14f0b21 9.5.25 landed
- d683d6528dba 9.6.21 landed
- 179775135b41 10.16 landed
- d1ab4bf6ed2d 11.11 landed
- be843ce29737 12.6 landed
- 86a5b309c933 13.2 landed
- 8a54e12a38d1 14.0 landed