Re: Best COPY Performance

Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>

From: Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>
To: Jim C.Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Worky Workerson <worky.workerson@gmail.com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-10-25T12:16:15Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 23 Oct 2006, at 22:59, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> http://stats.distributed.net used to use a perl script to do some
> transformations before loading data into the database. IIRC, when we
> switched to using C we saw 100x improvement in speed, so I suspect  
> that
> if you want performance perl isn't the way to go. I think you can
> compile perl into C, so maybe that would help some.


http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php? 
test=all&lang=perl&lang2=gcc

100x doesn't totally impossible if that is even vaguely accurate and  
you happen to be using bits of Perl which are a lot slower than the C  
implementation would be...
The slowest things appear to involve calling functions, all the  
slowest tests involve lots of function calls.