Re: Best COPY Performance
Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>
From: Alex Stapleton <alexs@advfn.com>
To: Jim C.Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Worky Workerson <worky.workerson@gmail.com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-10-25T12:16:15Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 23 Oct 2006, at 22:59, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > http://stats.distributed.net used to use a perl script to do some > transformations before loading data into the database. IIRC, when we > switched to using C we saw 100x improvement in speed, so I suspect > that > if you want performance perl isn't the way to go. I think you can > compile perl into C, so maybe that would help some. http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php? test=all&lang=perl&lang2=gcc 100x doesn't totally impossible if that is even vaguely accurate and you happen to be using bits of Perl which are a lot slower than the C implementation would be... The slowest things appear to involve calling functions, all the slowest tests involve lots of function calls.