Re: pg_execute_from_file review
David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-12-07T21:30:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Dec 7, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: >> Anyway, in a less blue-sky vein: we could fix some of these problems by >> having an explicit relocatable-or-not property for extensions. If it is >> relocatable, it's required to keep all its owned objects in the target >> schema, and ALTER EXTENSION .. SET SCHEMA is allowed; else not. This >> does nothing for the fix-the-search_path-property problem, though. > > The search_path is the complex (as in AI complete) part of it, but given > your idea here, we could make it so that only the non-relocatable > extensions benefit from the @extschema@ placeholder. +1 That might be an appropriate compromise. Best, David