Re: pg_execute_from_file review

David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>

From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-12-07T21:30:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Dec 7, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

>> Anyway, in a less blue-sky vein: we could fix some of these problems by
>> having an explicit relocatable-or-not property for extensions.  If it is
>> relocatable, it's required to keep all its owned objects in the target
>> schema, and ALTER EXTENSION .. SET SCHEMA is allowed; else not.  This
>> does nothing for the fix-the-search_path-property problem, though.
> 
> The search_path is the complex (as in AI complete) part of it, but given
> your idea here, we could make it so that only the non-relocatable
> extensions benefit from the @extschema@ placeholder.

+1

That might be an appropriate compromise.

Best,

David