Re: [GENERAL] Access 'field too long' error
Henshall, Stuart - WCP <shenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk>
From: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk>
To: 'Randall Perry' <rgp@systame.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-08-30T13:46:00Z
Lists: pgsql-general
I have succesfully linked the following table and view in both MS Access 97 and 2000. create table num_tbl(pk serial,n numeric(7,2),primary key (pk)); create view num_vw1 sa select * from num_tbl; I have had problems wiht indexes on 97 when used on fields it couldn't have indexed. If you post your table & view definition (as well as Access ver) I'll see if it works for me or not. - Stuart > -----Original Message----- > From: Randall Perry [mailto:rgp@systame.com] > Sent: 29 August 2002 18:31 > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: [GENERAL] Access 'field too long' error > > > Getting the error: > The size of a field is too long > > From access when trying to link to a view. Discovered the > problem field is > of type numeric(7,2). But, if I try linking to the table the > view is based > on, I don't get the error. So, somehow this numeric field in > a view looks > different to Access than the same numeric field in a table. > > Any ideas? > > > -- > Randy Perry > sysTame > Mac Consulting/Sales > > http://www.systame.com/ > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >