Thread

Commits

  1. Stabilize regression test result.

  2. Avoid premature free of pass-by-reference CALL arguments.

  1. pgsql: Avoid premature free of pass-by-reference CALL arguments.

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2018-02-10T18:37:17Z

    Avoid premature free of pass-by-reference CALL arguments.
    
    Prematurely freeing the EState used to evaluate CALL arguments led, in some
    cases, to passing dangling pointers to the procedure.  This was masked in
    trivial cases because the argument pointers would point to Const nodes in
    the original expression tree, and in some other cases because the result
    value would end up in the standalone ExprContext rather than in memory
    belonging to the EState --- but that wasn't exactly high quality
    programming either, because the standalone ExprContext was never
    explicitly freed, breaking assorted API contracts.
    
    In addition, using a separate EState for each argument was just silly.
    
    So let's use just one EState, and one ExprContext, and make the latter
    belong to the former rather than be standalone, and clean up the EState
    (and hence the ExprContext) post-call.
    
    While at it, improve the function's commentary a bit.
    
    Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29173.1518282748@sss.pgh.pa.us
    
    Branch
    ------
    master
    
    Details
    -------
    https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d02d4a6d4f27c223f48b03a5e651a22c8460b3c4
    
    Modified Files
    --------------
    src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++------
    src/test/regress/expected/create_procedure.out | 12 +++++++----
    src/test/regress/sql/create_procedure.sql      |  4 +++-
    3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
    
    
  2. Re: pgsql: Avoid premature free of pass-by-reference CALL arguments.

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2018-03-24T21:25:02Z

    On 2018-02-10 18:37:17 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
    > Avoid premature free of pass-by-reference CALL arguments.
    
    > src/test/regress/expected/create_procedure.out | 12 +++++++----
    > src/test/regress/sql/create_procedure.sql      |  4 +++-
    > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
    
    There's a recent llvm buildfarm animal failure related to this:
    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pogona&dt=2018-03-24%2020%3A10%3A01
    
    *** /home/bf/build/buildfarm-pogona/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/create_procedure.out	2018-03-23 08:10:44.326010286 +0100
    --- /home/bf/build/buildfarm-pogona/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/create_procedure.out	2018-03-24 21:15:28.749352165 +0100
    ***************
    *** 44,50 ****
      SELECT * FROM cp_test ORDER BY b COLLATE "C";
       a |   b   
      ---+-------
    !  1 | 0
       1 | a
       1 | xyzzy
      (3 rows)
    --- 44,50 ----
      SELECT * FROM cp_test ORDER BY b COLLATE "C";
       a |   b   
      ---+-------
    !  1 | 9
       1 | a
       1 | xyzzy
      (3 rows)
    
    With the differening output created by:
    
    CREATE PROCEDURE ptest1(x text)
    LANGUAGE SQL
    AS $$
    INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES (1, x);
    $$;
    CALL ptest1(substring(random()::text, 1, 1));  -- ok, volatile arg
    
    At first I was gosh darned confused, this really didn't seem likely to
    be an LLVM induced failure. And it turns out it isn't.  If the value
    returned by random() is very small, the text representation switches to
    scientific notation like 8.26204195618629e-05.
    
    So, perhaps we should choose a different volatile function here?
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
  3. Re: pgsql: Avoid premature free of pass-by-reference CALL arguments.

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2018-03-25T02:55:26Z

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
    > On 2018-02-10 18:37:17 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
    > CALL ptest1(substring(random()::text, 1, 1));  -- ok, volatile arg
    
    > At first I was gosh darned confused, this really didn't seem likely to
    > be an LLVM induced failure. And it turns out it isn't.  If the value
    > returned by random() is very small, the text representation switches to
    > scientific notation like 8.26204195618629e-05.
    
    Ooops.  I'll do something about that tomorrow.
    
    			regards, tom lane