Horton

Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>,Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>,PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-18T17:02:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On April 18, 2018 9:50:48 AM PDT, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> wrote:
>On 04/18/2018 12:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> Please change the name of the "JIT" parameter to something meaningful
>> to humans before this gets too far into the wild.
>> 
>> SSL is somewhat understandable because its not a Postgres-private
>term.
>
>JIT is hardly a Postgres-private term. It's a familiar term in a
>widespread community, though I might cede the point that the
>community in question is more compiler wonks than DBAs.

You're right. There's another thread where we discussed this. Also due to concern of Simon's. Can we not do so separately here?

Andres
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Commits

  1. Fix issues around EXPLAIN with JIT.

  2. Collect JIT instrumentation from workers.

  3. Make EXPLAIN output for JIT compilation more dense.

  4. Save/restore SPI's global variables in SPI_connect() and SPI_finish().

  5. Rationalize handling of single and double quotes in bootstrap data.