Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <andreas.zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>

To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>

Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com>, "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>, <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>

Date: 2008-01-28T11:25:45Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> I liked the "synchronized_sequential_scans" idea myself.
> 
> > I think that's a bit too long. How about "synchronized_scans", or
> > "synchronized_seqscans"?
> 
> We have enable_seqscan already, so that last choice seems to fit in.

Yes looks good, how about synchronized_seqscan without plural ?

Andreas