Horton

Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h

Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres@jeltef.nl>
To: "Jacob Champion" <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-01-21T07:50:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed Jan 21, 2026 at 12:17 AM CET, Jacob Champion wrote:
> I'd be fine with either; slight preference for "RESERVED" I suppose?

RESERVED seems clearer to me. And for people interested in why, the
comment above its definition describes it suffiecently.

Commits

  1. pqcomm.h: Explicitly reserve protocol v3.1