Re: pg_overexplain produces invalid JSON with RANGE_TABLE option

Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>

From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-16T01:22:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments


> On Apr 16, 2026, at 08:06, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 6:36 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
> <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Hackers,
>> 
>> It appears that pg_overexplain produces invalid JSON output when
>> EXPLAIN (FORMAT JSON, RANGE_TABLE) is used. The "Unprunable RTIs" and
>> "Result RTIs" properties are emitted as key:value pairs directly inside
>> the "Range Table" JSON array, which is structurally invalid.
> 
> Thanks for the report and the patch.  That makes sense.
> 
>> Attempted to fix this by moving ExplainCloseGroup() before the two overexplain_bitmapset()
>> calls, so the properties are emitted as siblings of "Range Table" in the parent object rather
>> than inside the array.
>> 
>> Attached a patch to address this which also includes a test.
> 
> I have added a commit message.  Will commit shortly to master and v18.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks, Amit Langote
> <v1-0001-Fix-pg_overexplain-to-emit-valid-output-with-RANG.patch>

Hi Amit, as the commit message mentions YAML format as well, but I don’t find a test case in pg_overexplain.sql, would it make sense to also add a test case for YAML. I tried to add one, see the attached diff file.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/




Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix pg_overexplain to emit valid output with RANGE_TABLE option.