Thread

  1. Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue

    Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> — 2025-10-25T00:33:33Z

    On Fri Oct 24, 2025 at 4:36 AM -03, Arseniy Mukhin wrote:
    >> I would expect to add 002_aborted_tx_notifies.pl in a separate patch
    >> since it's not related to this bug fix.
    >>
    >> ---
    >> +# Test checks that listeners do not receive notifications from aborted
    >> +# transaction even if notifications have been added to the listen/notify
    >> +# queue. To reproduce it we use the fact that serializable conflicts
    >> +# are checked after tx adds notifications to the queue.
    >>
    >> I wonder if we could implement this test using the isolation test
    >> instead of the tap test. Is there any reason why you used a tap test
    >> for that?
    >>
    >
    > I agree it's less relevant to the patch now than it was with the new
    > 'committed' field approach. And there is no particular reason why it
    > was implemented as a TAP test actually.. So +1 to move it to separate
    > patch (does it mean to separate thread as well or just separate patch
    > file?) and rewrite as an isolation test (IIUC it's better to use
    > isolation test infrastructure if it's possible). I can try to do it if
    > nobody else does it earlier.
    >
    On the v11 version that I've sent on [1] I've move this test into a
    separate patch, please feel free to implement it as an isolation test if
    you want it.
    
    [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/DDQZB2AD34V4.3RH2USCA72AS8%40gmail.com
    
    --
    Matheus Alcantara