Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-08-07T15:33:18Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Attachments
- v9-0001-Introduce-TAP-test-for-2PC-with-CIC-behavior.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0001
- v9-0004-PoC-fix-clear-xid.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0004
- v9-0003-Fix-CREATE-INDEX-CONCURRENTLY-in-precence-of-vxid.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0003
- v9-0002-PoC-fix-for-race-in-RelationBuildDesc-and-relcach.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v9-0002
> 6 авг. 2021 г., в 23:03, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> написал(а): > > But how to get why something did not happen? > During GetLockConflicts() proclocks SHMQueue do not include locks of concurrently running xid within PrepareTransaction() [seems like it's with PostPrepare_locks(), but I'm not sure]. > The problem is reproducible within 1 second by the script leading to amcheck-detected corruption. Ok, finally I've figured out this charade. AtPrepare_Locks() transfers fast-path locks to normal locks pointing to PGPROC with xid in a process of conversion to 2PC. ProcArrayClearTransaction(MyProc) resets xid int PGROCs. GetLockConflicts() sees empty xid and vxid. PostPrepare_Locks(xid) hids things with new PGPROC for 2PC. PFA PoC fix. But I'm entirely not sure it's OK to do reorder things at PrepareTransaction() this way. Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve contrib/amcheck's tests for CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- b1f943d2aa7e 14.1 landed
- 7f580aa5d88a 15.0 landed
- 5a4b8a8a720c 13.5 landed
- 141cd0ef0b0b 12.9 landed
-
Fix minor memory leaks in pg_dump.
- 70bef494000e 15.0 cited
-
Avoid race in RelationBuildDesc() affecting CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- e428699cb3be 9.6.24 landed
- db86746fd11e 10.19 landed
- 5141e471b36a 11.14 landed
- dde966efb286 14.1 landed
- 2e33b43599ad 13.5 landed
- 0869e53d3a07 12.9 landed
- fdd965d074d4 15.0 landed
-
Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for the newest prepared transactions.
- df6158139f64 11.14 landed
- 560124a37c2f 10.19 landed
- 5184932432b4 9.6.24 landed
- fe5d44a1d38f 12.9 landed
- a9d0a5409415 13.5 landed
- a5b9a0000e14 14.1 landed
- 3cd9c3b92197 15.0 landed
-
Add -w back to the flags for pg_ctl (re)start in PostgresNode
- b33259e261ae 15.0 cited
-
Fix CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY for simultaneous prepared transactions.
- 77a0e14f0b21 9.5.25 landed
- d683d6528dba 9.6.21 landed
- 179775135b41 10.16 landed
- d1ab4bf6ed2d 11.11 landed
- be843ce29737 12.6 landed
- 86a5b309c933 13.2 landed
- 8a54e12a38d1 14.0 landed