Re: DISTINCT *and* ORDER BY in aggregate functions on expressions(!)y

Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>

From: Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>
To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@evolvis.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-02-28T08:10:54Z
Lists: pgsql-general

> On 28 Feb 2023, at 3:54, Thorsten Glaser <tg@evolvis.org> wrote:

(…)

>> Well, that may be what you want, but it's not what you wrote in
>> the query.  Follow David's advice and do
> […]
>> I'm pretty sure that this will only incur one evaluation of the
>> common subexpression, so even though it's tedious to type it's not
>> inefficient.
> 
> Thanks. But I fear it’s not as simple as you wrote. More like:
> 
> jsonb_build_object('opening_times',
> 	jsonb_agg(DISTINCT jsonb_build_object(
> 		'weekday', cot.weekday,
> 		'from_hour', cot.from_hour,
> 		'to_hour', cot.to_hour)
> 	ORDER BY
> 	    jsonb_build_object(
> 		'weekday', cot.weekday,
> 		'from_hour', cot.from_hour,
> 		'to_hour', cot.to_hour)->>'weekday',
> 	    jsonb_build_object(
> 		'weekday', cot.weekday,
> 		'from_hour', cot.from_hour,
> 		'to_hour', cot.to_hour)->>'from_hour',
> 	    jsonb_build_object(
> 		'weekday', cot.weekday,
> 		'from_hour', cot.from_hour,
> 		'to_hour', cot.to_hour)->>'to_hour')
> )
> 
> Isn’t that more like it?


Perhaps you can use a lateral cross join to get the result of jsonb_build_object as a jsonb value to pass around?


Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.