Horton

Re: leakproof

Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>

View thread
From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
To: "Greg Stark *EXTERN*" <stark@mit.edu>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-02-20T08:57:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Greg Stark wrote:
> I suspect this is wrong for similar reasons as "pure" but I'll throw
> it out there: "hermetic"

I personally have no problem with "leakproof", but if it does not tickle
the right associations with many people:

What about "secure"? It is also not self-explanatory, but it might give
people the idea that it's more a problem of restricting access to
information
than anything else.

On the downside, "security" has been over- and abused so much already.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe