Horton

Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>

View thread
From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
To: "Pavel Stehule *EXTERN*" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-12-13T10:01:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add const qualifiers to node inspection functions

Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> One thing I forgot to mention:
>> I thought there was a consensus to add a WITH() or OPTIONS() clause
>> to pass options to the checker function:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/12568.1322669638@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>
>> I think this should be there so that the API does not have to be
>> changed in the future.
>>

> there is just one question - how propagate options to check functions
> 
> I am thinking about third parameter - probably text array

Either that, or couldn't you pass an option List as data type "internal"?

I don't know what is most natural or convenient.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe