Horton

Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>

View thread
From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
To: "Pavel Stehule *EXTERN*" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tom Lane *EXTERN*" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-12-07T15:30:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add const qualifiers to node inspection functions

Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> The syntax error messages are still inadequate; all I can get is
>> 'syntax error at or near "%s"'.  They should be more detailed.
> 
> this system is based on error messages that generates a plpgsql engine
> or bison engine. I can correct only a few percent from these messages
> :(
> 
> internally I didn't wrote a compiler or plpgsql checker - this is just
> tool that can emit some plpgsql interpret subprocess - and when these
> subprocesses raises exceptions, then takes their messages.

I see.

>> I think that at least the documentation should be improved before
>> I am ready to set this as "ready for committer".
> 
> please, can you send a correction to documentation or error messages?
> 
> I am not able to write documentation

I'll give it a try.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe