Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes
Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
From: "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
To: "Robert Haas *EXTERN*" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Greg Stark" <stark@mit.edu>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-02T07:11:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add new files to NLS file lists
- 194b5ea3d072 9.2.0 cited
Robert Haas wrote: > I suppose one interesting question is to figure out if there's a way I > can optimize the disk configuration in this machine, or the Linux I/O > scheduler, or something, so as to reduce the amount of time it spends > waiting for the disk. I'd be curious to know if using the deadline scheduler will improve things. I have experienced pretty bad performance with cfq under load, where sequential table scans were starved to the point where they took hours instead of less than a minute (on an idle system). But I believe that also depends a lot on the storage system used. Yours, Laurenz Albe