Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs

Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
To: "Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-10-26T02:29:19Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Oct 25, 2004, at 13:53, Anjan Dave wrote:

> I am dealing with an app here that uses pg to handle a few thousand 
> concurrent web users. It seems that under heavy load, the INSERT and 
> UPDATE statements to one or two specific tables keep queuing up, to 
> the count of 150+ (one table has about 432K rows, other has about 
> 2.6Million rows), resulting in ‘wait’s for other queries, and then 
> everything piles up, with the load average shooting up to 10+.

	Depending on your requirements and all that, but I had a similar issue 
in one of my applications and made the problem disappear entirely by 
serializing the transactions into a separate thread (actually, a thread 
pool) responsible for performing these transactions.  This reduced the 
load on both the application server and the DB server.

	Not a direct answer to your question, but I've found that a lot of 
times when someone has trouble scaling a database application, much of 
the performance win can be in trying to be a little smarter about how 
and when the database is accessed.

--
SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________