Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Finnerty, Jim <jfinnert@amazon.com>
From: "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-01-12T13:32:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add SLRU tests for 64-bit page case
- a60b8a58f435 17.0 landed
-
Make use FullTransactionId in 2PC filenames
- 5a1dfde8334b 17.0 landed
-
Use larger segment file names for pg_notify
- 2cdf131c46e6 17.0 landed
-
Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers
- 4ed8f0913bfd 17.0 landed
Re: patch that uses XID_FMT everywhere ... to make the main patch much smaller
That's exactly what my previous patch did, plus the patch to support 64-bit GUCs.
Maxim, maybe it's still a good idea to isolate those two patches and submit them separately first, to reduce the size of the rest of the patch?
On 1/12/22, 8:28 AM, "Simon Riggs" <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 at 08:21, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps we can merge some of the code cleanup that it contained, such as using XID_FMT everywhere and creating a type for the kind of page returned by TransactionIdToPage() to make the code cleaner.
>
>
> Agree, I think this is a good idea.
Looks to me like the best next actions would be:
1. Submit a patch that uses XID_FMT everywhere, as a cosmetic change.
This looks like it will reduce the main patch size considerably and
make it much less scary. That can be cleaned up and committed while we
discuss the main approach.
2. Write up the approach in a detailed README, so people can
understand the proposal and assess if there are problems. A few short
notes and a link back to old conversations isn't enough to allow wide
review and give confidence on such a major patch.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/