Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-11T18:09:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes: >> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >>> Hmm. To make that work, we'd have to have ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE use a >>> different default version name from what CREATE EXTENSION uses (unless > >> Yes. I see that as a good feature to have. stable and support looks >> like good default aliases for me, but again, IANANS (native speaker). > > I'm not very happy with that at all, either as to the concept or the > specific version-alias names. I don't think that CREATE and ALTER > really need different default version targets. And those choices of > names carry far too much baggage. "Default" is what they are as far as > the system is concerned, but names like those imply a lot more. > > Anybody else have an opinion on this detail? I think they should be the same. Anything else seems confusing and weird. Best, David