Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.

Jeff Amiel <jamiel@istreamimaging.com>

From: Jeff Amiel <jamiel@istreamimaging.com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-06-08T18:19:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 6/8/10 1:15 PM, "Jaime Casanova" <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Jeff Amiel <jamiel@istreamimaging.com> wrote:
>> 
>> ....Does Slony manage it's own vacuuming separate from postgres' autovacuum?
>> 
> 
> Yes it does: http://www.slony.info/documentation/maintenance.html


" It seems preferable to configure autovacuum to avoid vacuum
Slony-I-managed configuration tables. "


Hmmm....I don't do this.
Surely this is not relative to my corrupt indexes....2 attempted vacuums on
same indexes?