Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert

Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>

From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2021-06-09T15:14:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jun 9, 2021, at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> Here's a draft patch for that.  I decided the most sensible way to
> organize this is to pair the existing ensure_transaction() subroutine
> with a cleanup subroutine.  Rather unimaginatively, perhaps, I renamed
> it to begin_transaction_step and named the cleanup end_transaction_step.
> (Better ideas welcome.)

Thanks!  The regression test I posted earlier passes with this patch applied.

> Somewhat unrelated, but ... am I reading the code correctly that
> apply_handle_stream_start and related routines are using Asserts
> to check that the remote sent stream-control messages in the correct
> order?  That seems many degrees short of acceptable.

Even if you weren't reading that correctly, this bit:

    xid = pq_getmsgint(s, 4);

    Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(xid));

simply asserts that the sending server didn't send an invalid subtransaction id.

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






Commits

  1. Don't use Asserts to check for violations of replication protocol.

  2. Rearrange logrep worker's snapshot handling some more.

  3. Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.

  4. Logical replication support for TRUNCATE

  5. Logical replication support for initial data copy