Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer
Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
From: Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
To: Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Cc: Patvs <patvs@chello.nl>, "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-07-06T08:47:08Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 7/6/09 1:43 AM, "Scott Carey" <scott@richrelevance.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/5/09 11:13 PM, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir@paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >> Craig Ringer wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 11:51 -0700, Patvs wrote: >>> > There is no reason to go RAID 1 with SSD's if this is an end-user box and > the data is recoverable. Unlike a hard drive, a decent SSD isn't expected > to go bad. Clarification -- normal hard drives are expected to have a chance of dying within the first few months, or days. SSD's are expected to wear down slowly and die eventually -- but better ones will do so by entering a read-only state.