Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%

> On 1 Aug 2020, at 09:06, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
>>>> This patch no longer applies: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_27_2262.log
>>>> 
>>>> CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
>>> 
>>> This patch hasn't been updated and still doesn't apply, do you intend to rebase
>>> it during this commitfest or should we move it to returned with feedback?  It
>>> can always be re-opened at a later date.
>> 
>> As the thread has stalled, I've marked this Returned with Feedback.
> 
> Hmmm.
> 
> AFAICR the feedback is that the Expect perl module is not welcome, which seems to suggest that it would have to be re-implemented somehow. This is not my dev philosophy, I won't do that, so I'm sorry to say that psql coverage will remain pretty abysmal.

Re-reading this thread, I see no complaints about introducing a dependency on
Expect.  The feedback returned in this case is that the patch hasn't applied
since March, and that the patch is more than welcome to be re-entered in the
next CF once it does.

cheers ./daniel