Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions

On 11-02-10 05:20 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
>
> D'oh, I was thinking about whether it's safe to skip the internal
> subxact if you're in an implicit one and somehow I always convinced
> myself that since you eventually close the explicit one, it is.
>
> Obviously my testing wasn't enough :( Attaching an updated patch with
> improved docs incorporating Steve's fixes, and fixes&  tests for not
> statring the implicit subxact. That actually makes the patch a bit
> smaller ;) OTOH I had to remove the section from the docs that claimed
> performance improvement due to only starting the explicit subxact...
>

This version of the patch looks fine to me and seems to work as expected.


> Cheers,
> Jan
>
>
>