Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> Maybe there is second issue (little bit - performance - you have to
> call a output function), But I agree, so this information is very
> interesting and can help.

I am concerned about the performance impact of doing that.  Not all 
constraints are on int4 columns.  Some constraints might be on a geometry 
type that is megabytes in side taking a substantial chunk of CPU and 
bandwith to convert it into a text representation and then send it back to 
the client.



> I am open for any ideas in this direction.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>>
>> best regards,
>> Florian Pflug
>>
>>
>