Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15
Todd Cook <cookt@blackduck.com>
From: Todd Cook <cookt@blackduck.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Sajith
Prabhakar Shetty <ssajith@blackduck.com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>, "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-09-26T12:30:36Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Convert strategies to and from compare types
- c09e5a6a0165 18.0 cited
-
Enhance nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution.
- 5bf748b86bc6 17.0 cited
-
Improve planning of btree index scans using ScalarArrayOpExpr quals.
- a4523c5aa534 9.5.0 cited
-
Fix planning of btree index scans using ScalarArrayOpExpr quals.
- 807a40c551dd 9.3.0 cited
On 9/25/25, 3:47 PM, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg@bowt.ie <mailto:pg@bowt.ie>> wrote: > Should be noted that the regression itself is definitely "a small > effect that is multiplied by repetition". This makes the problem > rather perverse (though it's not exactly unusual for a complaint about > a planner regression to be perverse, in one way or another). Thanks for confirming. We can develop a strategy for working around this effect, so from my point of view, we can consider this matter resolved. I'm guessing that you feel the same way, but if not, I'm happy to help out in any way I can. In any case, I do appreciate your efforts and the time you took to write out the very helpful explanations you provided. __ -- todd