Horton
Menu

Re: standard_conforming_strings

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>, AlexHunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-07-15T13:20:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> wrote:
> On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com>  wrote:
>>>> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
>>>> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...
>>> 
>>> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
>>> cycles on it."
>> 
>> Should we do this?  Patch attached.
> 
> Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying "WARNING: The PGDG currently plan to change this setting's default in 9.1"?

Well, mostly that we could change our mind if it makes too big a boom.  And it's not as if we could go back and update everyone's docs after-the-fact. I agree we need some press, but the docs are not the right vehicle.

...Robert