Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-03-25T20:05:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mar 25, 2004, at 5:05, Jan Wieck wrote: > The difference here is that instead of submitting a patch for review, > which is then frozen, the branch owner can (and that means some will, > no matter what your intentions are) keep modifying the branch during > the review process, other than just keeping it in sync with > conflicting changes to the trunk. How do you plan to prevent that? You do both. Changesets are immutable. A patch cannot be modified. However, new patches can be added for tracking changes to the tree. You can review the original diff, and you can review how it's tracked head-of-line changes independently. You can take the original diff and manually wedge it in if you want, or you can see how the latest progress differs before submission. -- Dustin Sallings