Re: BUG: deadlock between autovacuum worker and client backend during removal of orphan temp tables with sequences

Thanks to all for review, testing and commit!!! 


On 2 April 2024 22:04:54 GMT+03:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Akshat Jaimini <destrex271@gmail.com> writes:
>> The code seems to implement the feature and has good and explanatory comments associated with it.
>> I believe we can go ahead with committing patch although I would request some senior contributors to also take a look at this patch since I am relatively new to patch reviews.
>
>Looks like a good catch and a reasonable fix.  Pushed after rewriting
>the comments a bit.
>
>As far as this goes:
>
>> I ran make installcheck-world after applying the patch and recompiling it. It did fail for a particular test but from the logs it seems to be unrelated to this particular patch since it fails for the following:
>
>> ==========================
>> select error_trap_test();
>> -      error_trap_test      
>> ----------------------------
>> - division_by_zero detected
>> -(1 row)
>> -
>> +ERROR:  cannot start subtransactions during a parallel operation
>
>... that's the test case from 0075d7894, and the failure is what
>I'd expect from a backend older than that.  Maybe you forgot to
>recompile/reinstall after updating past that commit?
>
>			regards, tom lane