Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-05-11T18:48:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> Late reply, but we are basically ignoring 'local' lines if the build >> doesn't support unix domain sockets (windows), but throwing an error for >> hostssl usage if ssl is not compiled in. Is the only logic here that >> 'local' is part of the default pg_hba.conf and hostssl is not? Is that >> good logic? > > I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error > for "local" lines. We'd have to fix initdb to remove that line from the > sample file (if it doesn't already), but that's surely not hard. It does already (that's what the @remove-line-for-nolocal@ markup in the sample file is for). So +1 for making it throw an error. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/