Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-06-20T23:03:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add bytea_agg, parallel to string_agg.
- d5448c7d31b5 9.2.0 cited
-
Fix ALTER TABLE ONLY .. DROP CONSTRAINT.
- c0f03aae0469 9.2.0 cited
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I agree we shouldn't do anything about the name lookups for 9.1 > That is SearchCatCache using RELNAMENSP lookups, to be precise, as > well as triggers and few other similar call types. Name lookups give ERRORs that look like this... relation "pgbench_accounts" does not exist >> The ALTER TABLE patch >> has greatly expanded the scope of the issue, and that *is* a regression >> compared to prior releases. > > I agree the scope for RELOID errors increased with my 9.1 patch. Which originally generated ERRORs like cache lookup failed for relation 16390 or could not open relation with OID 16390 which should now be absent from the server log. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services