Re: pgpool versus sequences

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, mangoo@wpkg.org, scott.marlowe@gmail.com, t-ishii@sra.co.jp, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2011-06-02T14:31:46Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Rearrange ALTER TABLE syntax processing as per my recent proposal: the
- a0b012a1ab85 8.4.0 cited

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Please note also that what pgpool users have got right now is a time
> bomb, which is not better than immediately-visible breakage.  I would
> prefer to try to get this change out ahead of widespread adoption of the
> broken pgpool version.

Hmm, I gather from what Tatsuo is saying at the web site that this has
only been broken since the release of 3.0 on February 23rd, so given
that I think your approach makes sense.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company