Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-05-05T20:16:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> However, it would in a lot of cases be very useful to have osmething >> like CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE <blah>. Which would only accept >> temporary (and maybe unlogged) tables. And then would auto-create the >> PG_<version>_<catversion> directory upon startup. >> >> That's obviously a 9.2 feature though, it's not an adjustment of an >> existing one, it's brand new :-) > > Yes, that's a nice feature for 9.2 +1. That's a really nice idea. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company