Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-05-05T20:16:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> However, it would in a lot of cases be very useful to have osmething
>> like CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE <blah>. Which would only accept
>> temporary (and maybe unlogged) tables. And then would auto-create the
>> PG_<version>_<catversion> directory upon startup.
>>
>> That's obviously a 9.2 feature though, it's not an adjustment of an
>> existing one, it's brand new :-)
>
> Yes, that's a nice feature for 9.2

+1.  That's a really nice idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company