Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>

From: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-05-03T18:55:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3 May 2011 19:45, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 20:07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Part of the problem is the name we're using for the feature.  "Unlogged
>> tables" sounds like we've taken something away and are calling that a
>> feature.  "Now with no brakes!"  As feature names go, it's as unsexy as
>> you can get.
>
> "nosql tables"? ;)

In all seriousness, I think it's important we should not mention
anything like that at any point. :S

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company