Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
From: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-05-03T18:55:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3 May 2011 19:45, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 20:07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Part of the problem is the name we're using for the feature. "Unlogged >> tables" sounds like we've taken something away and are calling that a >> feature. "Now with no brakes!" As feature names go, it's as unsexy as >> you can get. > > "nosql tables"? ;) In all seriousness, I think it's important we should not mention anything like that at any point. :S -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company