Re: deadlock_timeout at < PGC_SIGHUP?

2011/6/17 Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>:
> (2011/06/12 6:43), Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:48:26PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Me neither.  If making the deadlock timeout PGC_SUSET is independently
>>> useful, I don't object to doing that first, and then we can wait and
>>> see if anyone feels motivated to do more.
>>
>> Here's the patch for that.  Not much to it.
>
> I've reviewed the patch following the article in the PostgreSQL wiki.
> It seems fine except that it needs to be rebased, so I'll mark this
> "Ready for committers'.

OK, committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company