Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-05-10T09:14:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10 May 2011 09:45, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I think we need to refactor the function into something like: > > #define WL_LATCH_SET 1 > #define WL_SOCKET_READABLE 2 > #define WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE 4 > #define WL_TIMEOUT 8 > #define WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH 16 While I agree with the need to not box ourselves into a corner on the latch interface by making sweeping assumptions, isn't the fact that a socket became readable or writable strictly an implementation detail? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services